Skip to content

What if WAR was a startup product? Has it achieved PMF in 2026?

Benjemen Elengovan
Benjemen Elengovan
2 min read
What if WAR was a startup product? Has it achieved PMF in 2026?
Photo by UX Gun / Unsplash

I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately.

Not as a political take.
As a founder.

Because founders are trained to recognise one thing:

Product–market fit.

And when I look at the world right now…

I don’t see random conflict. I see a product that’s scaling.


If war was a startup, here’s what the metrics would say

  • 🌍 56 active conflicts globally — highest since WWII
  • 💰 $2.4 trillion+ in global defence spending (2024–2025) — all-time high
  • 📈 Defence budgets growing faster than GDP in many countries
  • 🤖 AI + autonomous weapons accelerating deployment cycles
  • 🚁 Drone warfare is reducing the cost per “engagement” dramatically

If you showed this to a VC, they’d say:

“Massive market. Strong demand. Increasing investment. Clear use case.”

That’s not scary.

That’s PMF.

Follow the incentives (this is where it gets uncomfortable)

In startups, we say:

“Revenue is truth.”

So let’s follow the money.

  • The top defence companies are seeing record backlogs and multi-year contracts
  • Governments are committing decades of forward spending
  • War is no longer reactive — it’s being budgeted in advance

Now compare that with:

  • Healthcare systems under strain
  • Cost of living rising globally
  • Youth unemployment is increasing in multiple regions

We say we want stability.

But we’re funding conflict like it’s infrastructure.


Meanwhile, the world founders are building…

On one side:

  • AI is replacing and reshaping jobs faster than ever
  • Founders are building automation, agents, and efficiency
  • We talk about productivity, scale, and margins

On the other:

  • Millions of people are being displaced
  • Entire regions are economically destabilised
  • Inflation is quietly eating into real income

We’re optimising systems… while the environment they operate in is degrading.


The real PMF signal no one talks about

PMF isn’t just usage.

It’s repeat behaviour + increasing investment + dependency.

War has all three.

  • Conflicts don’t resolve — they linger or restart
  • Budgets don’t shrink — they expand
  • Technology doesn’t slow it down — it makes it more efficient

If anything…

War is becoming a better product.

Faster. Cheaper. More scalable.


And here’s the part that bothers me

As a founder in the future of work…

I’m trying to:

  • Help people access their earnings faster
  • Build financial stability for independent workers
  • Create systems that increase trust

But zoom out for a second.

We’re building better financial rails…

In a world that’s becoming financially and politically more unstable.

That disconnect is hard to ignore.


So what does this tell us about the future?

Two things are compounding at the same time:

1. AI is accelerating everything

  • Productivity
  • Decision-making
  • Warfare capabilities

2. Human systems are fragmenting

  • Economically
  • Politically
  • Socially

That combination is dangerous.

Because it means:

We’re getting more powerful… without becoming more aligned.

Final thought (and maybe the uncomfortable truth)

If war has product–market fit in 2026…. It’s not because of one country.
Or one decision.It’s because the system rewards it. And markets don’t lie.


The question for founders like us

We love asking:

“What problem are we solving?”

Maybe we should also ask:

“What system are we reinforcing?”

Because if we don’t…

We might end up building incredibly successful companies…

In a world that’s quietly breaking.

Benjemen Elengovan

Startup Addict | Founder & CEO of MyGigsters | Tech Enthusiast | ClubHouse @benjemen and Podcast Host

Comments